略過產品資訊
1 / 1

Pierre Bourdieu Photography A Middle-Brow Art

Pierre Bourdieu Photography A Middle-Brow Art

定價 HK$380.00
定價 售價 HK$380.00
特價 售罄
Photography: A Middle-brow Art : Bourdieu, Pierre: Amazon.co.uk ...

UN ART MOYEN: ESSAI SUR LES USAGES SOCIAUX DE LA PHOTOGRAPHIE A ...


Photography: A Middle-brow Art : Bourdieu, Pierre: Amazon.co.uk: Books

Bourdieu Pierre Photography A Middle-Brow Art | PDF

法國社會學大師**皮耶·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的著作《攝影:一種中產階級藝術》(Photography: A Middle-Brow Art,法文原著 Un art moyen 於 1965 年出版),是文化社會學與影像研究的經典之作。布迪厄在書中指出,大眾看似極具個性且自發的日常攝影行為(如家庭照、旅遊紀錄、婚禮攝影等),實際上深受社會階級、群體規範與文化慣習(Habitus)**的制約與系統性形塑。 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
這部作品的核心論點與社會學洞察主要涵蓋以下三個維度:

1. 為何是「中產階級藝術」(Middle-Brow Art)?
布迪厄將攝影定義為「中產階級藝術」(或譯次等藝術、通俗藝術),因為它在文化階層中的定位極其尷尬:[1]
  • 缺乏法定制度支持: 攝影不像繪畫、音樂或文學那樣,在當時擁有成熟的學院派體制、經典評審標準及嚴格的合法性認證。
  • 技術門檻低: 任何人只要按下快門就能拍照,這種技術上的可普及性,使其難以像傳統高雅藝術(High Art)那樣天然具備彰顯精英身分的「排他性」。
  • 大眾的可企及性: 它是一種人人都可參與、介於高雅文化與通俗文化之間的文化實踐。 [1]

2. 攝影的社會功能與階級實踐
書中結合了人類學觀察與問卷調查,揭示了不同社會階級如何透過攝影展現截然不同的「品味」與社會需求:[1, 2]
  • 勞動階級(Lower Classes)——功能主義導向: 基層大眾拍照主要是為了祭儀 solemnization 與家庭凝聚。他們在婚禮、節日或家庭團聚時拍照,目的是留下集體記憶與強化社會整合。對他們而言,照片的價值在於「拍了什麼」(功能與情感),而非「怎麼拍」(美學形式)。 [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • 資產階級與知識份子——美學與區隔(Distinction)導向: 為了擺脫攝影流於「俗氣」的家庭實用功能,攝影愛好者、相機俱樂部(Camera Clubs)和專業攝影師會極力追求技術的精準與美學的精緻。他們試圖透過拍攝不尋常的題材、運用複雜的構圖與光影,來賦予攝影「藝術尊嚴」,藉此宣告自己擁有更高的文化資本,與普通大眾劃清界線。 [1, 2, 3]

3. 核心社會學概念的奠基
這本書是布迪厄早期發展其核心理論的重要里程碑,為他日後發表的分量級巨著《區隔:品味判斷的社會批判》奠定了實證基礎: [1]
  • 文化慣習(Habitus): 個人內化的社會結構與階級背景,在潛移默化中決定了你會選擇在什麼場景、對著什麼物件按下快門。
  • 社會區隔(Social Distinction): 品味並非純粹客觀的美學判斷,而是一種階級鬥爭的場域。人們透過對文化產品(如攝影)的消費與評判方式,來標榜自身的社會地位。 [1, 2, 3]
總結來說,布迪厄藉由這部作品破除了「攝影是自由創作」的浪漫神話,向世人證明:我們的鏡頭如何對焦,實際上取決於我們在社會結構中所處的位置。 [1, 2]

The book Photography: A Middle-Brow Art (original French work Un art moyen published in 1965) by Pierre Bourdieu, a master of French sociology, is a classic of cultural sociology and image research. Boudieu pointed out in the book that the public's seemingly unique and spontaneous daily photography behavior (such as family photos, travel records, wedding photography, etc.) is actually deeply constrained and systematically shaped by social class, group norms and cultural habits (Habitus)**. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The core arguments and sociology insights of this work mainly cover the following three dimensions:

1. Why "Middle-Brow Art"?

Boudieu defines photography as "middle-class art" (or translated as sub-class art, popular art), because its positioning in the cultural class is extremely awkward: [1]

Lack of legal system support: Unlike painting, music or literature, photography had a mature academic system, classic evaluation standards and strict legality certification at that time.

Low technical threshold: Anyone can take photos as long as they press the shutter. This technical popularity makes it difficult to have the "exclicivity" of highlighting the elite identity as naturally as traditional high art.

Public accessibility: It is a kind of cultural practice that everyone can participate in, between elegant culture and popular culture. [1]

2. The social function and class practice of photography

The book combines anthropology observation and questionnaire survey to reveal how different social classes show completely different "tastes" and social needs through photography: [1, 2]

Working Class (Lower Classes) - Functionalism orientation: Grassroots public photography is mainly for solemnization and family cohesion. They take photos at weddings, festivals or family reunions in order to leave collective memories and strengthen social integration. For them, the value of photos lies in "what is taken" (function and emotion), not "how to take it" (aesthetic form). [1,2,3,4]

Bourgeoisie and Intellectuals - Aesthetics and Distinction Orientation: In order to get rid of the "tacky" family practical function of photography, photography enthusiasts, Camera Clubs and professional photographers will strive to pursue the precision of technology and the exquisiteness of aesthetics. They try to give photography "artistic dignity" by shooting unusual subjects and using complex compositions and light and shadow, thus declaring that they have higher cultural capital and drawing a clear line with the general public. [1, 2, 3]

3. The foundation of the core sociology concept

This book is an important milestone in the early development of Boudieu's core theory, and laid the empirical foundation for his later weight-level masterpiece "Separation: Social Criticism of Taste Judgment": [1]

Cultural habit (Habitus): The social structure and class background of personal internalization, in the subtlety, determine which scene you will choose to press the shutter on and what object.

Social Distinction: Taste is not a purely objective aesthetic judgment, but a field of class struggle. People promote their social status through the consumption and judgment of cultural products (such as photography). [1, 2, 3]

To sum up, Boudieu broke the romantic myth that "photography is free creation" through this work, proving to the world that how our lens focuses actually depends on our position in the social structure. [One, two]

庫存不足:剩餘 1 件

查看完整資訊